Did VAR get the 決定／判定勝ち（する） which 廃虚d 'one of the greatest FA Cup moments' WRONG? Fans （人命などを）奪う，主張する zoomed-in image shows offside lines 存在 drawn over the middle of Man 部隊d 星／主役にする's foot to 否定する Coventry 121st-minute '勝利者'

• e-mail

Fans have （人命などを）奪う，主張するd the VAR line was drawn over Aaron 病弱な-Bissaka's foot for Haji Wright's offside in Manchester 部隊d's FA Cup 半分-final 勝利，勝つ over Coventry City - but 公式の／役人s have 二塁打d 負かす／撃墜する on the 決定／判定勝ち（する）.?

VAR 支配するd Wright offside by a fraction after he 補助装置d 勝利者 Torp in the 121st minute at Wembley, with Coventry thinking they had finished a generational 復帰 to 勝利，勝つ 4-3. Manchester 部隊d went on to 勝利，勝つ 4-2 on 刑罰，罰則s after a 3-3 draw.?

Many felt that the ごくわずかの 決定／判定勝ち（する） was cruel and that it '廃虚d one of the greatest FA Cup moments ever', while others 観察するd that VAR was 簡単に doing its 職業.?

However, sleuths have zoomed in on the moment Wright was 支配するd offside and believe the VAR lines that 非難するd him were drawn over 病弱な-Bissaka's foot - rather than at the very end of his boot.

A source の近くに to the PGMOL 確認するd to Mail Sport that the offside 決定／判定勝ち（する） was 訂正する.?

The 決定／判定勝ち（する） to 支配する Haji Wright offside after he 補助装置d Coventry City's '勝利者' against Man 部隊d on Sunday 証明するd 議論の的になる

Fans believe the blue VAR line was drawn over Aaron 病弱な-Bissaka's boot for the offside call against Wright

VAR 支配するd Coventry's extra-time 勝利者 in Sunday's FA Cup 半分-final marginally offside and a source の近くに to the PGMOL 確認するd to Mail Sport that the 決定／判定勝ち（する） was 訂正する

The source explained that the line was not drawn over 病弱な-Bissaka's foot as social マスコミ commenters had 推測するd. His foot 存在 の近くに to or on the ground may have given that impression.?

VAR lines are drawn on the 主要な part of the defender and the 主要な part of the 攻撃者 with which they can 得点する／非難する／２０. The 決定／判定勝ち（する） has a '寛容' level in favour of the 攻撃者 if the lines touch, which gives the 今後 the 利益 of the 疑問.?

In that 事例／患者, a green line would be shown, but the lines were not touching in the 事例／患者 of Wright and 病弱な-Bissaka, meaning there was no 疑問.

So 罰金 were the 利ざやs that Coventry boss 示す コマドリs joked Wright would have been considered onside had he 削減（する） his toenails.?

'They drew the lines over 病弱な-Bissakas toes to make the Coventry player offside. Robbed of an all time classic FA Cup moment,' one fan （人命などを）奪う，主張するd on X, 以前は Twitter.??

'This is not what football is about. VAR 廃虚d one of the greatest FA Cup moments ever. A toenail offside. Give me a break. Coventry should be in the final. Utterly pathetic,' one テレビ視聴者 ガス／煙d.?

Another 追加するd: 'VAR kills all the joy of sport. Coventry robbed of one of the greatest moments in their history because Wright's toenail was offside.'?

One fan said: 'A classic example of an offside call that didn't 存在する before VAR - the 解答 to a problem that no one felt needed solving.'

病弱な-Bissaka had a tricky day, giving away a 刑罰，罰則 late in 正規の／正選手 time to let Coventry equalise

勝利者 Torp thought he had 得点する／非難する／２０d the decider for Coventry against 部隊d in the 121st minute of the FA Cup 半分-final

The Red Devils 前進するd to the FA Cup final on 刑罰，罰則s and 始める，決める up a repeat of last year's showpiece against Manchester City?

Manchester 部隊d had been 3-0 up and 巡航するing に向かって a second FA Cup final in a 列／漕ぐ／騒動.?

Goals from Scott McTominay, Harry Maguire, and Bruno Fernandes had given Erik ten Hag's 味方する a 命令（する）ing lead.

But Coventry had other ideas up their sleeve and a goal from Ellis Simms before a widly deflected strike from Callum O'Hare 始める，決める up a nervy end.?

And after 病弱な-Bissaka was adjudged to have 扱うd the ball in the area, Wright stepped up in the 95th minute to 激突する home, make it 3-3, and take a pulsating match into extra-time.?

Coventry had their chances to steal glory in extra-time - Wright dragged a 発射 wide of the 地位，任命する and Simms 攻撃する，衝突する the 妨げる／法廷，弁護士業 after working some space in the box.

But Torp's disallowed 勝利者 is the moment that broke the hearts of Coventry fans, before they were broken again for good 手段 in a 4-2 刑罰，罰則 shoot-out 敗北・負かす.

Some 部隊d fans had already 出口d Wembley after seeing what they thought was the winning goal and were filmed dashing 支援する inside as the game went to 刑罰，罰則s.?

In the 影響, Ten Hag 主張するd that blowing a 3-0 lead and only 捨てるing through against a 選手権 刑罰，罰則s was not an 'embarrrassment' for his expensively 組み立てる／集結するd outfit.?

'We have reached two 決勝戦 in two years and that is a 抱擁する 業績／成就,' he said. ‘I see the mistakes we make. You can’t 避ける them. But it’s not an 当惑, it’s a 抱擁する 業績／成就.

Erik ten Hag 主張するd it was not an '当惑' that his 味方する only just 捨てるd through

‘We can play at very high levels but in same match we can go to very low levels and it’s not explainable. It’s about game m anagement, 責任／義務 and 決定／判定勝ち（する） making.

‘We have to do better in these occasions. On several occasions like this we let the result slip away but today we got away with it. I don't think 長，率いるs dropped but we had many 後退s and maybe our reaction is human but it's not 許容できる. When you are in 支配（する）／統制する you should 勝利，勝つ easily.?

‘We can't say this group doesn't have the 権利 mentality because they showed character today, but in the final part there was a 欠如（する） of discipline. This season has had many ups but also many 負かす／撃墜するs.

‘Winning the FA Cup doesn't make the season successful. We want to 勝利，勝つ more. I have mixed feelings and there are mixed feelings in the dressing room.

‘First you have to put yourself in a winning position but then you have to take it over the line. In these moments we are making mistakes and not sticking to our 責任／義務s.’

部隊d will play Manchester City in the final on May 25. It is the first time the same two teams have contested 連続する FA Cup 決勝戦 since 1885.??