My car 賃貸しの company wrongly 告発(する),告訴(する)/料金d me for a 行方不明の tyre weeks after I returned the 乗り物, what can I do? 消費者 lawyer DEAN DUNHAM replies

We 雇うd a car for a break in and around Florence. We returned the car, it was 検査/視察するd and the 訂正する 量 of money (機の)カム off my credit card. But three weeks later I’ve been 告発(する),告訴(する)/料金d on the same credit card for a spare tyre which was 明らかに 行方不明の from the boot.

What are my 権利s?

E.K. 経由で email

The customer was charged for a spare tyre which was apparently missing from the boot three weeks after returning the car

The 顧客 was 告発(する),告訴(する)/料金d for a spare tyre which was 明らかに 行方不明の from the boot three weeks after returning the car

DEAN DUNHAM? REPLIES: When you 選ぶd up the car, a 代表者/国会議員 of the 雇う company should have 検査/視察するd the car in your presence and filled out a check-out form, 詳細(に述べる)ing its 条件, 含むing any pre-存在するing 損失 such as scratches to the paintwork and any other 重要な 事柄s, such as a 行方不明の spare tyre. Likewise, when you returned the car, the 雇う company 代表者/国会議員 should have carried out a その上の ins pection and 完全にするd a check-in form, to 査定する/(税金などを)課す if you had 原因(となる)d any new 損失 or if any other 問題/発行するs with the car had occurred during your period of 雇う. You should therefore check to see what these two 文書s say as you would 推定する/予想する a 行方不明の spare tyre to be 記録,記録的な/記録するd, 特に on the check-in form.

If there is no について言及する of a 行方不明の spare tyre on the check-in form, or the check-out form 記録,記録的な/記録するs the 乗り物 had no spare tyre, put your (民事の)告訴 in 令状ing to the 雇う company. Your (民事の)告訴 should 明確に 明言する/公表する there was no spare tyre and 最高潮の場面 that this is supported by the check-out and/or check-in form ? and 需要・要求する an 即座の refund.

If the 雇う company 辞退するs your refund, you can turn to your credit card provider and make a Section 75 (人命などを)奪う,主張する. It is important that you 現在の your card provider with all the 証拠 and 最高潮の場面 that there is no 証拠 supporting the 雇う company’s position that the car had a spare tyre during the 雇う period. In these circumstances, your Section 75 (人命などを)奪う,主張する should be successful.

This question 最高潮の場面s the importance of the check-out and check-in forms when 雇うing a 乗り物. Don’t just let the 雇う company 代表者/国会議員 fill out the forms unchecked, look over them carefully and make sure you are happy that the forms 正確に 記録,記録的な/記録する the 条件 of the 乗り物. I also always advise 消費者s to take lots of pictures of the 乗り物 at the start and end of the 雇う period. It is this invaluable 証拠 that will 保護する you if the 雇う company wrongly (人命などを)奪う,主張するs you’ve 原因(となる)d 損失 or 除去するd something from the 乗り物.