I 設立する out my daughter is not biologically 地雷 - I'm 荒廃させるd but people think I am wrong to want to leave my wife

A father has 誘発するd a furious 審議 after 明らかにする/漏らすing his 計画(する)s of abandoning his wife and child after finding out the girl might not be biologically his.

The 匿名の/不明の man, who is believed to be from the US, 株d on?Reddit?that during an emblazoned 列/漕ぐ/騒動 with his wife, she let slip that their nine-year-old may not belong to him.

On その上の 調査, the husband discovered that his wife's 疑惑 was true and he is now considering 需要・要求するing a 離婚.?

However, this move would 潜在的に leave his ex and the child he once believed was his daughter homeless.?

Reddit 使用者s bashed the father in the comments, branding him as '全く messed up' and '明確に a bad dad'.

Reddit users were horrified to learn that a man was prepared to abandon his nine-year-old daughter after disco
vering she was not biologically his (stock image)

Reddit 使用者s were horrified to learn that a man was 用意が出来ている to abandon his nine-year-old daughter after discovering she was not biologically his (在庫/株 image)

The man, 37, explained:? 'We had been married for 10 years and we have a daughter who is nine going on 10.

'Me and my wife had a fight and she said something about my daughter not 存在 地雷 I kept a straight 直面する but after she realised what she said she left and went to bed.?

'I had never thought about my daughter not 存在 地雷, but I had to know if she was or wasn't.?

'Long story short I got a paternity 実験(する) and I wasn't her father. I showed it to my wife who begged and pleaded with me not to get a 離婚, but I told her that I was.'

After 株ing the heartbreaking news with friends and family, the man says they all encouraged him to 削減(する) his ex-wife and her daughter out of his life.?

He continued: 'I don't want to raise a child that's not 地雷 nor do I wanna 支払う/賃金 for her either.?

'My wife keeps calling me telling me not to make her and our child homeless, but I don't care if she is homeless or not she shouldn't have cheated.'

Before asking members of the 会議 for their opinion, the man 明らかにする/漏らすd that the girl's real father had died a few years ago.?

The man explained that although he raised the young girl for nine years and her biological father is dead, he has no desire to raise or pay for a child that does not biologically belong to him

The man explained that although he raised the young girl for nine years and her 生物学の father is dead, he has no 願望(する) to raise or 支払う/賃金 for a child that does not biologically belong to him

Many flocked to the comments, horrified by what the man had said about a child he raised for nine years.?

'That poor little girl. She doesn't know you are not her daddy,' one wrote.

'Wife is an a******, but you may not be your daughters bio-dad but to her you are her dad,' a second penned.

Another chimed in: 'This is what makes me sad. He’s not upset or heartbroken.?

'He’s angry. He should be sad that she isn’t because he loves her. Poor kid'

'Yeah, he 明確に doesn't love her. The hard thing is that she probably adores him. This is going to 荒廃させる her,' a Reddit 使用者 replied.

One questioned: 'You raised that kid for 10 years and would be 罰金 with never seeing her again? With her growing up realizing that she wasn’t 価値(がある) keeping in your life?

Others were baffled by the man's thought 過程, with one person 明言する/公表するing that they could never '削減(する) off' a child they raised.

Reddit users branded the man as a 'terrible father' with some going as far to say the girl would be better off without him

Reddit 使用者s branded the man as a 'terrible father' with some going as far to say the girl would be better off without him

They 追加するd: 'Sure I would be 荒廃させるd and definitely wouldn't stay married. But the little girl would still be "地雷".'

Another person branded him a 'terrible father' who never tried to 'connect with his daughter'.

They quipped: '[He] probably would make her life marginally worse by 存在 in it.'

Some 使用者s were keen to point out that although the young girl may not biologically belong to the man but he may still be 合法的に 責任がある her 福利事業.

'Not sure where you are but you may still be financially 責任がある any child born to your wife while you were married.'