最初の／主要な school teacher who was 解雇（する）d by school for teaching nine-year-old pupils how to do a TikTok dance loses 不公平な 解雇／（訴訟の）却下 （人命などを）奪う，主張する
- Georgia Rogers also sent?'borderline unprofessional' messages to a student
A 最初の／主要な school teacher was 解雇（する）d for teaching pupils as young as nine how to do a TikTok dance にもかかわらず the app banning anyone under the age of 13, a 法廷 has heard.?
Georgia Rogers was 解雇する／砲火／射撃d after bosses at West Grantham Church of England 最初の／主要な 学院 in Grantham 設立する she had '容赦するd' under-age students using the social マスコミ 場所／位置.
An 雇用 法廷 heard that the Lincolnshire-based 最初の／主要な school teacher also failed to 報告（する）／憶測 her pupils use of the app - which 禁止（する）s children under 13 - 違反ing the school's 保護（する）／緊急輸入制限ing 手続き.
The 審理，公聴会 was told that on a later occasion the pupils asked another teacher if they could film a TikTok ビデオ and when they were told they could not they said '井戸／弁護士席 行方不明になる Rogers did'.
The teacher was 解雇する／砲火／射撃d after an 調査 into her 行為／行う 設立する 'a number of small things which put together make a bigger 関心ing picture'.
West Grantham Church of England 最初の／主要な 学院 in Grantham, Lincolnshire where?Georgia Rogers worked before 存在 解雇する／砲火／射撃d over her 行為／行う
The 最初の／主要な school teacher helped children film a TikTok dance にもかかわらず the app banning under 13-year-olds
Ms Rogers 告訴するd the school for 不公平な 解雇／（訴訟の）却下 and disability 差別, （人命などを）奪う，主張するing she was 苦しむing from PTSD.
にもかかわらず an 雇用 裁判官 説 the 調査 into the TikTok 主張 was '欠陥d', her （人命などを）奪う，主張するs were 拒絶するd.
The Nottingham 法廷 heard 行方不明になる Rogers started teaching at West Grantham Church of England 最初の／主要な 学院 in Lincolnshire, in September 2019.
雇用 裁判官 Victoria Butler said 行方不明になる Rogers was 'undoubtedly a committed teacher who enjoyed her 職業' with a previous 'unblemished disciplinary 記録，記録的な／記録する'.
The 審理，公聴会 was told that on the last day of 称する，呼ぶ／期間／用語 in July 2021, the pupils in the teachers' year five class '手配中の，お尋ね者 to show her a TikTok dance'.
行方不明になる Rogers 'agreed' and said she would teach them the moves as she used to be a dance teacher, and she 記録，記録的な／記録するd it on the school's iPad.
The 法廷 公式文書，認めるd this ビデオ was not uploaded の上に any social マスコミ 場所／位置 but 最高潮の場面d how it was 'evident' that the children had been '見解（をとる）ing TikTok'.
The 合法的な age for the app is 13 and it was said that 行方不明になる Rogers did not '報告（する）／憶測 it as a 保護（する）／緊急輸入制限ing' for her underage nine to ten-year-old students.
The 審理，公聴会 was told that after the summer holidays, it then 現れるd that 行方不明になる Rogers had also been sending 'borderline unprofessional' messages to one of her students and her mother through Dojo, an online 壇・綱領・公約 used by the school.
含むd in the 広範囲にわたる messages was 行方不明になる Rogers sending the pupil a photo of her nails and telling her mum 'Bless her, I just love her' and 'Send her my love'.
EJ Butler said: 'She referred to [the pupil] as 'sweetheart' and did nothing to discourage the communication which she knew （機の）カム 直接／まっすぐに from the pupil 同様に as her mum.'
Soon after these messages '（機の）カム to light' in September, the teacher was 一時停止するd.
An 調査 続いて起こるd where a number of '主張s' were 調査／捜査するd by the school.
The 法廷 said there was a 'その上の 主張 about TikTok' which occurred in October that year.
Another teacher 報告（する）／憶測d that two pupils were '繰り返して asking them to film TikTok ビデオs' and when she said she was not 許すd to - they said '井戸／弁護士席 行方不明になる Rogers did'.
During her disciplinary 審理，公聴会, 行方不明になる Rogers s 援助（する） that 'whilst she was aware the children were 見解（をとる）ing TikTok, Facebook and Instagram she explained to them that it was not appropriate to make a TikTok ビデオ in school'.
The teacher said she showed them how to do the dance they had seen on the app 適切に using her dance teacher background and ビデオd them using the school's iPad.
But, 行方不明になる Rogers 'did not スピードを出す／記録につける the pupils' use of TikTok as a 保護（する）／緊急輸入制限ing 関心 にもかかわらず her knowledge that the 合法的な age for using it was 13.
On March 10 2022, the teacher was 解任するd as the 捜査官／調査官s 設立する 行方不明になる Rogers 全体にわたる behaviour 量d to 甚だしい／１２ダース 不品行／姦通.
The teacher 'understood the age grading of TikTok to be 老年の 13' - but had taught pupils how to dance a 'recognised TikTok dance' and filmed this for them on the pupils' iPad, the 調査 結論するd.
In 存在 解任するd, 行方不明になる Rogers was told: 'The パネル盤 therefore felt that this could be seen as 容赦するing pupils to use a social マスコミ 場所／位置 that was not appropriate for 10 year olds.
'その上に, にもかかわらず knowing that the students were using TikTok you did not raise this as a 保護（する）／緊急輸入制限ing 関心, which you 定評のある you should have done.'
The 最初の／主要な school teacher 控訴，上告d the 決定／判定勝ち（する） and 現在のd 文書s which, in her 見解（をとる）, '論証するd that the school 促進するd the use of TikTok'.
These 含むd teachers 'encouraging pupils to watch Newsround which 定期的に featured articles relating to TikTok'.
This 控訴，上告 was 拒絶するd as the school said the '推論する／理由s' she 始める，決める out are 'not considered 有能な of fundamentally changing our 見解（をとる） that your 解雇／（訴訟の）却下 was the 訂正する and reasonable 活動／戦闘 for the 信用 to take'.
行方不明になる Rogers was 解雇（する）d and later 告訴するd for 不公平な 解雇／（訴訟の）却下 and disabili ty 差別, （人命などを）奪う，主張するing she was 苦しむing from PTSD.
EJ Butler 結論するd that the school's 調査 into the TikTok 主張 was '欠陥d' and as a result the 主張 itself did not result in '甚だしい／１２ダース 不品行／姦通'.
However, the 法廷 設立する 解任するing 行方不明になる Rogers in relation to the other 主張s was the 'reasonable 返答' and her （人命などを）奪う，主張するs were not upheld.
