Meghan Markle's half-sister Samantha 控訴，上告s 裁判官's 決定／判定勝ち（する） to 解任する 名誉き損 事例／患者 against her over 'disparaging hurtful and 誤った' comments she made during 2021 Oprah Winfrey interview

• e-mail

Meghan Markle's half-sister Samantha is not giving up her 名誉き損 事例／患者 without a fight after her 弁護士／代理人／検事s とじ込み／提出するd an 控訴，上告 against a 裁判官's 判決，裁定 that 解任するd the 訴訟 in March.?

Last month, Florida 裁判官 Charlene Edwards Honeywell said that the 事例／患者 should be 解任するd because Samantha 'failed to identify any 声明s that could support a （人命などを）奪う，主張する for defamation.'?

The comments were 関係のある to Prince Harry and Meghan's 悪名高い 2021 interview with American talk show host Oprah Winfrey.??

The 控訴 was 解任するd with prejudice, meaning that it cannot 簡単に be refiled.?

However, Samantha's team are 捜し出すing to overturn that 決定／判定勝ち（する）, によれば a new 合法的な とじ込み／提出するing that was seen by Newsweek.?

'Notice is hereby given that the 原告／提訴人, Samantha M. Markle, by and through her undersigned counsel, 控訴，上告s to the 部隊d 明言する／公表するs 法廷，裁判所 of 控訴，上告s for the Eleventh 回路・連盟 from the Order 認めるing 被告s, Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex, 動議 to 解任する entered by the Honorable Charlene Edwards Honeywell on March 12, 2024,' the 文書 reads.?

A 裁判官 解任するd Samantha Markle's defamation 控訴 against her sister Meghan in March. Samantha was 捜し出すing 損害賠償金 in 超過 of $75,000

The 決定／判定勝ち（する） in March saved the Sussexes, pictured here at the 最近の NAACP awards, from a 裁判，公判 in Florida that was 始める，決める to begin in November 2024

Pictured: Meghan Markle at Samantha's 卒業 in 2008.?Samantha, 59, has （刑事）被告 her famous sister of defamation by 関わりあい／含蓄 for Meghan 示唆するing to Oprah that she grew up as an only child?

The March 決定／判定勝ち（する） spared Meghan, 42, from a 裁判，公判 which was 始める，決める to take place at the 法廷，裁判所 in T ampa in November.

Samantha, 59, has been 捜し出すing at least $75,000 for defamation and defamation by 関わりあい／含蓄 for Meghan 示唆するing to Oprah that she grew up as an only child.

Meghan also said that Samantha only changed her 指名する 支援する to Markle after she began dating Harry.

によれば Samantha, Meghan made 類似の （人命などを）奪う，主張するs in the Netflix series and the 主張s 支配するd her to 'humiliation, shame and 憎悪 on a 世界的な 規模'.

In her 58-page 判決，裁定, 裁判官 Honeywell said that Meghan's 声明s could not be defamatory because they are '大幅に true based on judicially noticed 証拠' or 'not 有能な of 存在 considered defamatory'.

Samantha had failed to 'plausibly 主張する that they are defamatory in the first place', the 裁判官 said.

The 裁判官 公式文書，認めるd that Meghan's comments about her childhood was her '単に opining' that she did not have a の近くに 関係 with Samantha, her half sister with whom she 株 a father.

裁判官 Honeywell said that Samantha's （人命などを）奪う，主張する that Meghan '暗示するd that (she) was a liar and a fame-探検者', was an '妥当でない mischaracterization' of what the Duchess said.

Samantha Markle is seen in February outside the courtroom in Tampa, Florida, where she was? trying to 納得させる a 裁判官 to 許す her defamation 事例／患者 against Meghan Markle to proceed

Samantha Markle （人命などを）奪う，主張するs that Meghan defamed her in her 2021 interview with Oprah Winfrey

Turning to Meghan's 声明 that Samantha changed her 指名する from Rasmussen, her married 指名する, 支援する to Markle after the Duchess began dating Harry, the 裁判官 said that 'the gist was true'.

She wrote: 'That 原告／提訴人 used one last 指名する and then the 指名する Markle soon after 報告（する）／憶測s of 被告's 関係 with Prince Harry were published is 大幅に true, based on the 展示（する）s in the 記録，記録的な／記録する, of which the 法廷，裁判所 has taken judicial notice.'?

の中で the 声明s in Samantha's （人命などを）奪う，主張する was one by Harry in the Netflix series in which he said: 'Perhaps the most troubling part of this is the number of British 新聞記者／雑誌記者s interacting with and amplifying the hate and the lies'.

But 裁判官 Honeywell said: 'That this 声明 was 含むd in the （民事の）告訴 is perplexing and 示唆するs haste, a 誤解 of the 法律, or a 欠如（する） of diligence on the part of 原告／提訴人's counsel.

'It is 不明瞭な how this 声明 could be defamatory に向かって 原告／提訴人, as it does not 言及／関連 her'.

In her 結論, 裁判官 Honeywell wrote: '原告／提訴人's （人命などを）奪う，主張するs will be 解任するd with prejudice, as she has failed to identify any 声明s that could support a （人命などを）奪う，主張する for defamation or defamation-by-関わりあい／含蓄 by this point, her third try at 修正するing her （民事の）告訴, in either the 調書をとる／予約する Finding Freedom, the Netflix series Harry & Meghan, or 被告 and her husband's hour-long テレビ放送するd CBS Interview'.

The 事例／患者 was 初めは とじ込み／提出するd in March 2022 and in 合法的な filings Samantha 詳細（に述べる）d at length how she was 'very の近くに' to Meghan when they grew up in Los Angeles.?

Samantha helped Meghan with her homework, took her shopping and had a 'wonderful 関係' with her, it was （人命などを）奪う，主張するd.

Samantha Markle has frequently appeared on television shows to talk about her half sister

の中で the 声明s in Samantha's （人命などを）奪う，主張する was one by Harry in the Netflix series in which he said: 'Perhaps the most troubling part of this is the number of British 新聞記者／雑誌記者s interacting with and amplifying the hate and the lies'

But once Meghan began to become famous on the TV series 控訴s, she 'no longer had time' for Samantha and by 2016 they ha d stopped visiting each other, it was （人命などを）奪う，主張するd.

The 訴訟 （人命などを）奪う，主張するd that once Meghan met Harry she became '敵意を持った' to Samantha 同様に as the 残り／休憩（する） of her family.

The 'defining moment' of Meghan's 'unwarranted 敵意' に向かって Meghan happened in 2017 when the Duchess 恐らく 'hung up the phone すぐに' upon 審理，公聴会 Samantha's 発言する／表明する.

Samantha called 支援する but 'to this day Meghan has never returned Samantha's phone call', she （人命などを）奪う，主張するd.

Since then Meghan has 'belligerently 試みる／企てるd to malign Samantha and other family members', the 訴訟 明言する／公表するs.

Meghan's method is to '終結させる friendships, rather than save them, and for her to become 敵意を持った', the 訴訟 （人命などを）奪う，主張するs.

Before her wedding in 2018, Meghan and Samantha's father Thomas Sr 苦しむd two heart attacks but instead of showing him 'grace and compassion, she 効果的に 終結させるd her 関係'.

Thomas Sr had been caught 提起する／ポーズをとるing for photos with a paparazzi 機関 and Meghan has 公然と （人命などを）奪う，主張するd that she did not believe he was telling her the truth.

After that it is 申し立てられた／疑わしい that Meghan 'started her smear （選挙などの）運動をする and 現在進行中の deluge of distorted facts and stories, 完全にする with 偽の 引用するs ab out and 'by' Samantha'.

The 訴訟 even （人命などを）奪う，主張するs that Meghan has 'encouraged 憎悪 of Samantha through a bot 網状組織 which 原因（となる）d 広大な／多数の／重要な 害（を与える） to Samantha'.

Samantha and Meghan have had a difficult 関係 for years which 爆発するd into public 見解（をとる） after Meghan's 約束／交戦 to Harry was 発表するd in 2017.

Samantha was 引用するd by 新聞記者／雑誌記者s as 説 that 'The Queen would be appalled' and called her a 'ducha**' on Twitter.

In her memoir, 肩書を与えるd 'The Diary of Princess Pushy's Sister', Samantha （人命などを）奪う，主張するd that Meghan ordered their father to disown his children from his first marriage if he 手配中の，お尋ね者 an 招待 to her wedding.

によれば the 調書をとる／予約する, Meghan told Thomas Sr to 離婚 himself from her and her brother Thomas by 説: 'You don't need them!'

Thomas Sr 辞退するd and 恐らく said: 'I love you all 平等に' to which Meghan replied: 'Why can't you just 従う?'